Back to Squawk list
  • 2

Arrests in Boston Underscore TSA Folly

提交時間:
 
The arrest of five airline employees in Boston underscores one of the most ridiculous protocols of airport security: the fact that tarmac workers are exempt from TSA screening, while pilots and flight attendants are not. Also last week, the renowned graphic designer Massimo Vignelli passed away at age 83. Vignelli was the creator of the famous "AA" emblem of American Airlines. Unfortunately for him, he lived just long enough to witness the ruination of this iconic logo. (www.askthepilot.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


dbaker
dbaker 5
I agree completely with your point, but it seems a little disingenuous to start out asserting that flight crews go through the same security as passengers, and then mention Known Crewmember at the end of the article. The reality is that KCM is available for crews operating the vast, vast majority of flights (even at smaller airports like Columbia SC, Jacksonville FL, etc) and, as a result, crewmembers actually go through almost no security; less hassle and scrutiny than even pre-9/11.

The problem with the ground workers is definitely one of the big secrets nobody talks about. And it extends beyond the workers with access to the aircraft; arguably you would need screening of the kitchens and employees who work at the catering kitchens.

I'm not sure what the solution is, but the ground worker issue is really reflective of the larger situation; the TSA security charade is largely ineffective, so it's not much worse to have ground workers be unchecked. That's why the TSA is moving masses of people into TSA Pre and encouraging airlines to do so. It's no less secure than the "full" screening, so why not (finally) reduce the hassle?
preacher1
preacher1 3
Well, as he said, KCM did take 10-12 years to get there, and it's placement in the story just gives emphasis to he idiocy in place that took it so long. There should be a national outcry on the ramp worker thing. That totally defeats the purpose of pax screening, at least in my mind, by allowing access to the plane by unscreened people. Holding off KCM for so long is like a kindergarten mistake up beside this.
WithnailANDi
The only reason you would need to screen catering kitchens or employees thereof is if you were worried about them poisoning someone. Meals are loaded onto carts with no extra room for things like smuggled drugs... and then they are served to passengers. From my years as a flight attendant, I can tell you that we open the catered food containers and count them during pre-flight checks, and would see and report anything unauthorized in the meal carts. So no, catering kitchens are not part of this problem. The ramp personnel, however, have access to compartments in the plane that are not accessible by the flight attendants or passengers, and can easily bring contraband on board and remove it at the destination. In certain destinations, like Jamaica, the f/a's are not allowed to leave the plane during stopovers because the ramp and cleaning personnel come aboard and steal the passengers' carry on bags, and drinks from the plane. This has been a security issue as long as the airlines have been in existence.
chiphermes
Chip Hermes 2
Do you chemically field test the contents of the wine bottles?

登入

還沒有帳戶嗎? 現在就註冊(免費),設置諸多客制化功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎?
通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告,您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性,同時不顯突兀,以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單,或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.
退出