mark holmes
| Member since | |
| Last seen online | |
| Pilot certificate | Sport |
| Language | English (USA) |
This link is something that should be relevant. Does this article show that the plane was strafed with 30cal guns as they say? Is there someone who can tell us? ///////////////////I've been asking some of these questions for awhile on your website....my posts are here, if you can't find them because they're hidden now on the FlightAware site: http://flightaware.com/user/mdholmes ///// LOOK at the pictures of what has been identified as 30cal bullet holes at or near the cockpit area: http://www.globalresearch.ca/german-pilot-speaks-out-shocking-analysis-of-the-shooting-down-of-malaysian-mh17/5394111 I would like to pose this question to Mr. Dan Baker, http://flightaware.com/about/executives/baker as a result of his interview with Bloomberg on the 18th of July, the day after the crash of MH17, here: http://www.bloomberg.com/video/the-mh17-blame-game-bloomberg-west-07-18-BOPZ62VJQuCR~EOdJ82~lA.html 1. At about 8:25 into the interview, my trans
(Written on 07/31/2014)(Permalink)
Herr G, I have no idea who you are; why would I attack you? I won't. I will remind you that my ONLY interest is in the FACTS. Where are the facts in your response? Here is all I find: "Narcissistic diatribes" "Conspiracy theory" "Visceral attack" Each of these is are adjectives (narcissistic, conspiracy (ie: conspiratorial), visceral) followed by nouns (diatribes, theory, attack). When discussing important ideas, issues or Facts (all nouns), it is more convincing and persuasive to avoid modifiers (adjectives) preceding nouns. The reason for this is simple: modifiers, without supporting FACTS, are by definition, Subjective: (" "subjective" , adj. 1. Existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than the object of thought (opposed to "objective") 2. Pertaining to or on the part of an individual; personal; .....3. Placing reliance on one's own moods, attitudes, or OPINIONS"). (Source: Random House College Dictionary, Pg 1308, published1
(Written on 07/25/2014)(Permalink)
!!!!!!!!!!!!Important Update from FA from Questions Aboujt Flight Tracks and MH12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 25 2014 at 1:15am Central Time Zone: Now an update to the previous posts that have (almost?) all been "down voted" on this site: http://flightaware.com/user/mdholmes I appreciate the reply you guys sent me via email the the other day, and will post it here, as I promised. Mr. Baker, the only thing that interests me is factual information. Unfortunately, I'm now more confused than ever; are you? I'm only interested in the truth about FlightAware--what they can do, and what they can't do, what they're sure about, and what they're not sure about. Please tell us a story and stick to it: First, we in the FA "community' were told that FA knew or implied that they knew exactly where the flights were, not just on the 17th, but on days before that: ALL the tracks were GREEN. 1. A still (for now) functioning link with "actual" location information
(Written on 07/25/2014)(Permalink)
Karl, Wie geht's? Ist es moglich, du gesagt hast: "e-credibility: the non-guaranteeable likelihood that the electronic data you're seeing is genuine rather than somebody's made-up crap. - Karl Lehenbauer"? Sag' mal: Von null - ein hundert, deine stimm: FA E-CRED? A. Vor der entwicklungen? B. Und Nachdem? Gutte Nacht, Und Bis Bald! MH
(Written on 07/22/2014)(Permalink)
Chip and Joel, The links provided were to illustrate that this service altered data, period. Without explanation. The example I gave was altered flight route data from the flight MH17 Which took place on the 14th as an example ONLY. This date was chosen because the 14th was just one date covered by this article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-shot-down-the-malaysian-jet-over-ukraine/5391917?print=1 If you take two minutes and click on that link you will see a screenshot of the flight path from the MH17 that took place on the 14th that clearly goes far south of the crash site AS REPORTED TWO OR THREE DAYS AGO ON FA. This southerly route was consistently reported for at least 4 or 10 or more MH17 flight days before 7 17 2014, according to FAs website. Also you will see the rationale for dependence on FACTS AND DATA in unraveling a crime. When that data changes, as it has on this site, other kinds of investigations must and should be initiated. If you only have 3
(Written on 07/22/2014)(Permalink)
Joel, I sincerely appreciate your comments if you ar suggesting that I didn't post something like that and I have no IDEA what that is referring to, nor have I, nor would I ever post anything like you described. In any case, I just wish I could figure out: 1. Why all my comments about changes in factual data reports on flight aware have been "down voted" or removed or buried so they can't be found on this site without extraordinary efforts. 2. What is the problem with asking questions? 3. Why has No One in this "community" (the word used by the FA STAFF ON THE TELEPHONE TODAY) even commented on the substance of the FACTS about these altered flight tracks on these particular days? 4. Why are my comments the only ones that I can find that have been "down voted"? 5. Why was I told by FA employees today that they can log into customers accounts, and that might explain why votes on these posts appear as difficult to explain or why votes might be counted that I (we?) didn't act
(Written on 07/21/2014)(Permalink)
Brian, Good idea. Where do you suggest going? If altering data on this site is no big deal, then maybe you need to lighten up: From your post: "UTair Aviation 767-300 NEAR MISS/GO AROUND at Barcelona-El Prat Int'l No it does not. Crossing a runway while another aircraft is short on final certainly IS a big deal. (Written on 07/07/2014)(Permalink)" After all, changing the entire story about how these flights crossed the Ukrane Border in the middle of an international crisis about who shot it down is "NOT" a "big deal", right? If this information had not been quoted by hundreds of news stories around the world, and was being used to argue who is at fault, and why, maybe I would believe you, but sorry. I don't.
(Written on 07/21/2014)(Permalink)
MH17 post correction about changed date and "Map Behavior" See request on specific information that is being asked from management at FA to explain altered map tracks, which need to be explained: RE: Altered Data on MH17 Flight Tracks on FA: ****IMPORTANT******* I am posting this again because the link that I posted before did not appear anywhere you could find it....this is the link to the buried story that I can't find anymore without a very significant effort: here is where it was posted before it got buried: http://flightaware.com/squawks/view/1/recently/popular/43065/newest if I have received a response from FlightAware, I can't see it in my email. To All Members of FlightAware: I am going to post an email that I sent today to FA, as well as the receipt that I got from them right afterwarda....Please PLEASE PLEASE JOIN ME TO GET REAL ANSWERS: //////////BEGIN EMAIL TO FLIGHTAWARE.COM SENT TO CONTAC@FLIGHTAWARE DOT COM/////// Subjec
(Written on 07/21/2014)(Permalink)
Posting information about the "map behavior" :
(Written on 07/21/2014)(Permalink)
Login
| Your browser is unsupported. upgrade your browser |