Yes....if AF1 was suddenly required to land at an airport not designed to group VI standards I feel certain everyone would pull together to make it happen. Unfortunately, restrictions to taxi routes and procedural changes are not something easily determined at the last minute. Most POTUS movements are certainly preplanned but in aviation we all know things can occur that are unannounced. Just thought I'd bring up the issue as there are likely airports that will be used that are not yet prepared for an aircraft of this size. Still love that the Air Force went with Boeing. Great thread and good info to know if you're an airport that Air Force One uses frequently based on who is elected.
Both the A380 and the 747-800 are Group VI design aircraft. There are a lot of ramifications for airport access when it comes to aircraft of this size. I am surprised they are going with this model for that reason alone. The FAA has been less inclined to approve MOS (Modification of Standards)allowing Group VI aircraft to operate at airports only approved/designed for aircraft up to Group IV or Group V standards. Here is a good article on the issue although it appears to be written some time ago (2010?)and the data is dated on the issue. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/2010_q3/3/
I love the fact that the Air Force is buying American for Air Force One...I really could not see the U.S. doing otherwise. Be interesting to see how this works out for them.
This aircraft is what is known as a Group VI design aircraft for airport layouts. Many airports are not built to this standard. I am surprised they are selecting a Group VI aircraft because of possible restrictions for its use. It is not just about runway design but also taxiway and ramp designs for this aircraft type and size.
