Why not require all device manufacturers to take steps on reducing out of band reception if that will cause failure of the device? We require the transmission to be on frequency. Why not say receivers need to be on frequency if it will cause themselves interference.
I agree. All receiver portions need to be treated with part 15 type rules which mitigate interference. It should follow that certification includes a devices ability to ignore interference from outside its own operating band.
This is Part 15. What I don't understand is why all devices don't have to be Part 15 compliant not just the one operating in what are technically so called unlicensed spaces.
What I don't understand is why band specific receivers don't have the same restrictions as enforced by Part 15. Which is that receivers have to ignore signals from out of band. I don't think we need new laws, we just need to enforce the ones already on the books.
