@Nic Tanner October 1st, 2020 - Boeing Confirms ALL 787 production moving to SC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lk6Ro0HOH18 You should look things up before spouting off.

(Written on 2021年 07月 20日)(Permalink)

That study was based on false assumptions. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/danish-study-doesnt-prove-masks-dont-work-against-the-coronavirus/#:~:text=The%20Danish%20trial%2C%20known%20as%20the%20Danish%20Study,involving%20face%20masks%20and%20COVID-19%20to%20report%20results.

(Written on 2021年 06月 25日)(Permalink)

First off - Hazmat levels are A-D and in their definition they have nothing to do with biological levels. Hazmat tends to be chemical not biological. Biological labs are 1-4 with a few level 4 labs. Here educate yourself. https://fens.sabanciuniv.edu/en/biological-safety-levels#:~:text=Table%207.1%20Biosafety%20levels%20%20%20Biosafety%20Level,cabinets%2C%20po%20...%20%201%20more%20rows%20 Now, show us your citation for SARS-COVID-19 (the virus name - Covid-19 is the disease you get from SARS-COVID-19) can not be worked on in a Level 4 lab. So all the work from the vaccine manufactures, the CDC and other researchers was carried out in ..... your neighbors garage?

(Written on 2021年 06月 25日)(Permalink)

Just in: Texas Judge on Hospital staff: i.e. Houston Methodist Headline: "Federal judge dismisses lawsuit from Texas hospital employees over COVID vaccine requirement" "U.S. district judge Lynn N. Hughes said in his ruling that claims that the vaccines are dangerous are "false, and it is also irrelevant." Hughes noted that Texas law "only protects employees from being terminated for refusing to commit an act carrying criminal penalties to the worker," and that receiving a COVID-19 vaccine "is not an illegal act." From the local Huston CBS news affiliate search for the headline.

(Written on 2021年 06月 13日)(Permalink)

So where is the case? Just showing a database does not demonstrate a single liability case. Anyway, the Covid-19 vaccine providers do share some liability relief. The question is, where is the case (asking for just one) where an employer is being sued for not hiring a person due to not being vaccinated. A database about vaccine reactions is not a lawsuit database. An employer has the right to have a set of requirements for employment. Having to have received a vaccine is a perfectly reasonable to be hired. I would imagine that there are plenty of jobs where certain vaccines are a requirement for employment.

(Written on 2021年 06月 11日)(Permalink)

Have you applied for a job at United? No Job - no Gun.

(Written on 2021年 06月 11日)(Permalink)

Show us one case - just one. Where this has happened. From a real news source, including the court docket. No Tik-Tok, Facebook, Twitter, Faux News or Talk radio unsupported Horse Biscuits/Cow Pies.

(Written on 2021年 06月 11日)(Permalink)

To quote you: "just go away and die" The best thing you have said so far.

(Written on 2021年 03月 12日)(Permalink)

Please show us the do not treat form you have so when you get infected, we (society in general) will not have do deal with you.

(Written on 2021年 03月 12日)(Permalink)

Well DUH! Strange thing for a Government regulator to do? Clickbait...

(Written on 2021年 02月 26日)(Permalink)