← Back to Squawk list

Air Force: Our New Tanker Should Be Ready for War in 3 or 4 Years

提交時間：大約一年之前

A long list of technical problems means the KC-46 tanker will not be battle-ready for at least three to four years, a top U.S. Air Force general said Wednesday. (www.govexec.com) 更多...

ToddBaldwin3

17 個會員評論

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Jeff Phipps 大約一年之前 4

"The last plane was delivered debris free". Something seriously wrong this picture if that's a highlight.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sharon bias 大約一年之前 6

The culture of the military is of honor and a trust of your fellow soldier. When these folks collide with the corrupt business practices of many vendors, you aren't going to get a good outcome. It is not the nature of the military to constantly question your superiors which needs to be done when working with contractors. The military needs a department of Guido to beat on contractors and keep them in-line.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

djames225 大約一年之前 5

Why in the H do engineers have to make things so stupid. Mount a camera on the boom and a camera on the tail and have 2 monitors..both camera would have night visibility..aircraft gets close, you can then watch the boom to make sure it's on target, guiding both it and the pilot...smh.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

ToddBaldwin3 大約一年之前 1

Or, for that matter, what's wrong with the old system? A window for the good ole Mark I eyeball.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

RECOR10 大約一年之前 0

You are forgetting the time needed for all the corruption in a typical Govt Contract.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

siriusloon 大約一年之前 5

Boeing. 'Nuff said.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Don Quixote 大約一年之前 0

Boeing > Airbus. 'Nuff said.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

babyracer 大約一年之前 1

https://imgur.com/DnFRBgM

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

djames225 大約一年之前 0

Boeing is not better than Airbus so quit with the "King Boeing" With Boeings BS as of late, this just adds to it. This is Not the Boeing I admired of yesteryear!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Chris B 大約一年之前 1

Boeing gets a massive amount of money from the US Gov (you and me) every year. #1 recipient of Tax payer dollars. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2019/03/27/lockheed-martin-boeing-get-most-money-federal-government/39232293/

Whether its a bag of bolts or tools (in Boeing speak spare parts), the loss of confidence in Boeing is massive.

Losing the refueling contract would have been good for Boeing. Sometimes you need a slap in the face to wake up to your problems.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

djames225 大約一年之前 1

What I cannot wrap my head around, is how is it the 179 tankers will only cost about $45 Bil according to the GOA office? I think someone must have slipped badly with a math mistake. That would put each unit, that has a Boeing cost of $223 mil, plus maintenance, @ roughly $26 mil each.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report