← Back to Squawk list

39

Airbus A350-1000 Features Automated Rapid-Descent Capability

提交時間：6年之前

Airbus has incorporated an automatic emergency descent function into the newly-certified A350-1000, which it intends to introduce into the smaller -900. (www.flightglobal.com) 更多...

31 個會員評論

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

jetserf 6年之前 4

Regarding lower traffic, the chance of hitting someone below you would be slim. Compared with a complete hull loss it’s worth the risk. I’d be more concerned with terrain.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Dan Moraru 6年之前 2

If your cellphone is such a distraction, turn it off!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Palak Bhattacharyya 6年之前 1

Going the Tesla way!Great feature and if its not too difficult in retro fitting this feature into the avionics of existing aircraft it will be a buck well spent.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Highflyer1950 6年之前 1

Gulfstream has had this for years. Works extremely well when required. Speaking of wearing a mask at altitude, where is the chart that shows O2 usage on long haul flights?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

James Beech 6年之前 1

What about the traffic below.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

PLANESOLUTIONS 6年之前 2

ATC will direct them out of the way.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Torsten Hoff 6年之前 3

And even if they don't, TCAS will.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

fernando kosop 6年之前 0

lot´s of automation........and lot´s of "decisions" taken away from pilots. That cannot lead aviation to a safer path...on the contrary.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Jorge Ferreira 6年之前 7

Well, the pilots are still there aren't they? So the decisions aren't taken away from them.
Automation is supposed to make life easier (and safer) ... Like my car, already saved me a couple of times when I got distracted by the cellphone and it maintained itself between the road lines ;-)

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Zany4God 6年之前 1

The 777 crash @SFO had extra eyes in flight deck, yet seem to have forgotten who or what controlled the air speed. Automation?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

744pnf 6年之前 -3

Coming closer to a pilot and a dog in the cockpit.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

joel wiley 6年之前 5

I think they are trying to replace the dog with a robot running a variation on the whack-a-mole algorythm.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Zany4God 6年之前 1

LOL.... Frogger

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

lyndon hardin 6年之前 0

Is there an acronym in place? I propose ARDEC.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

lyndon hardin 6年之前 0

On further research, I find the Army already has a lock on ARDEC.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Viator092 6年之前 0

Citation X too. 90’s technology.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

i5xswipe 6年之前 1

Heck even the Cirrus SR22T, has this feature. It is interaction based off course and not pressurization based.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

dj horton 6年之前 1

Citation 650 also. 80’s technology.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

lyndon hardin 6年之前 0

I concur with many posts I have read here. With automated rapid descent how can a pilot know about lower level traffic?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

lyndon hardin 6年之前 2

Without further study, the only craft I know of with keel windows is the UH-1.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

randomwalk 6年之前 0

If accompanied by an abrupt turn to starboard that would alert ATC, who would alert other traffic; although the system does have the ATC alert, as well.
I’d like to see this on smaller pressurized aircraft, as it could have potentially saved the life of Payne Stewart other passengers and crew when they experienced hypoxia in their aircraft.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

PLANESOLUTIONS 6年之前 2

The Honeywell systems I've worked with turn left and squawk 7700. Aircraft with auto-throttle descend pretty quickly, without it can take a while as over-speed protection keeps descent rate low. This has been common on mid-range and up business jets for 10-15 years.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

randomwalk 6年之前 1

Thanks for the information; I wasn’t aware of the Honeywell system.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

patrick baker 6年之前 -2

unnecessary if one pilot wears a mask at altitude. This is a solution in search of a problem.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

jetserf 6年之前 2

I get colds like clockwork after using the masks despite cleaning them.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

lyndon hardin 6年之前 2

The masks can get nasty.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

jetserf 6年之前 1

Not just the masks. The tubing probably has stuff growing in it.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Ken McIntyre 6年之前 -2

Deploy the drogue 'chute and hope for a splash down.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Randall Kimm 6年之前 1

I do not think that this remark is called for since "real lives" are in a potentially life threatening situation. Where lives are at risk this kind of remark is un-called for.
Please think before hitting the post comment tag.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Lois Lettini 6年之前 -4

If this system fails, are the pilots REALLY trained to know what to do?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

PLANESOLUTIONS 6年之前 4

The system exists for the occurrence of depressurization and incapacitated flight crew. If the flight crew has passed out then training really doesn't matter - Until they regain consciousness when the aircraft levels at a lower altitude (15,000 feet).

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

登入

您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎？

通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告，您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性，同時不顯突兀，以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單，或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.

退出