Back to Squawk list
  • 26

Boeing Initiates Changes to 787 Power Panel

提交時間:
 
EVERETT, Wash., Nov. 24, 2010 /PRNewswire/ -- Boeing (NYSE: BA) is developing minor design changes to power distribution panels on the 787 and updates to the systems software that manages and protects power distribution on the airplane. These changes come as the result of what has been learned from the investigation of an onboard electrical fire on a test airplane, ZA002, earlier this month in Laredo, Texas. (boeing.mediaroom.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


Booho
Peter D 0
It has taken for ever let's go Boeing !!!!!!!! How many years has it been? Good luck ! :)
mikezc128
I agree lets go!!!!! Airbus new A350 is going to be out before the 787 and they havent even had 1 flying!!! 2 years of delays for the 787.
chalet
chalet 0
No my friends, I am not going to fly on any B-787 or A-380 aircraft, the latter with RR engines, the former with any make of engines, unless they have flown at least 4 years in a fully safe manner.
indy2001
indy2001 0
Do it right, Boeing. These aircraft will fly for decades, so it's much better to work out as many problems as possible before it goes into service. (Remember the DC-10 debacle.) Airbus will have just as many, if not more, problems with their new aircraft. And the A380 program is draining billions from their bank accounts, so they will have fewer resources to work with. Unlike the previous poster, however, I don't have any problem with flying on RR power, once their engines have been certified. Despite the fact that they are pushing the edge of the power envelope, slamming RR seems to have become the fashionable thing to do.
chalet
chalet 0
indy2001, apparently you have not been reading the newspapers, the RR engine on the 380 WAS FULLY CERTIFIED last year by the European and American and Singaporean and Australian authorities, otherwise Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, Emirates or Qantas whould not be flying them in commercial operations. OK, for me one thing is certification by the authorities and a totally different thing an arbitrary I must admit minimum limit of 4 years in reliable and fully safe manner. Not RR bashing, just playing it safe, Sam.

登入

還沒有帳戶嗎? 現在就註冊(免費),設置諸多客制化功能、航班提醒等等!
本網站使用cookie。您使用並繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您接受這一點。
退出
您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎?
通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告,您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性,同時不顯突兀,以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單,或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.
退出