Back to Squawk list
  • 19

White House: 'Why we need aviation user fees'

提交時間:
 
After almost 9,000 people urged the president to take damaging aviation user fees off the table, the administration on Jan. 13 offered its response: No way. (www.aopa.org) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


TXCAVU
How about ATC gets a system that actually works and then we'll talk fees.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
I am of the opinion the gov does not need another fee or tax for any purpose what so ever! Work with what you got, period.
jonprovencher
Woah! An idea that makes little sense, is vague, and is open to interpretation! When did the government start making those!?! *sarcasm intended*
andrewderr
andrewderr 0
It just makes me ill to read such a poorly written WH response. That lame response really does show us the intelligence factor (or lack thereof) at work in these fees. It took me 90 seconds of research to see the difference in the fuel taxes confirmed in the AOPA article. You would think the WH has these resources too. What a halfassed halfcocked halfthought response to 8904 citizens' petition.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
Lame has become the new standard.
kylevk
The response says that this fee would reduce the budget deficit by $10 billion over 10 years. The debt increases by FOUR BILLION DOLLARS every DAY.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
The plane is crashing but they have yet to declare an emergency.
chris13
This fits right in with their class-warfare rhetoric. Obviously, every person that flies an airplane MUST be one of those "evil" rich guys. If someone in the WH actually had a clue, they'd understand why user-fees will be crippling to the GA community.
CTaylor959
Added cost for student pilots is not a good thing for pilot population

登入

還沒有帳戶嗎? 現在就註冊(免費),設置諸多客制化功能、航班提醒等等!
本網站使用cookie。您使用並繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您接受這一點。
退出
您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎?
通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告,您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性,同時不顯突兀,以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單,或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.
退出