本網站使用cookie。您使用並繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您接受這一點。
退出
您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎?
通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告,您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性,同時不顯突兀,以創造一流的網站體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單,或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.
退出
Back to Squawk list
  • 27

Boeing Trade-Case Win Prompts New Trump Threat of EU Sanctions

提交時間:
 
The U.S. threatened to impose sanctions against the European Union after the World Trade Organization ruled that Airbus SE received illegal government funding to develop jetliners, costing Boeing Co. sales. (www.bloomberg.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


wylann
wylann 4
What's the fundamental difference between the subsidies Airbus gets and the tax break subsidies that Boeing gets (Boeing has paid zero in federal taxes many years running now)?

I really am curious if this is a matter of semantics and the court didn't get it, or there really is some difference in how it works that makes one significantly better than the other?
Duijn
Andre Duijnmayer 6
So 'subsidy to develop new airplanes' is illegal?

Doesn't that mean then that any type of 'research and development' tax incentives are illegal?
Including the trillions of dollars that governments sink into developing jet fighters?

Looks to me that's it's time to investigate parties on both sides to see who's receiving kickbacks from making such ridiculous statements.
paulgilpin1953
paul gilpin 3
just a guess here, but judging by your last sentence, you are unfamiliar with the term arkancide.
nasdisco
Chris B 4
So you lost the battle with Canada....now you take on a much bigger foe.

Lets look at all the NTSB and Pentagon subsidies, let alone the cronyism of the Refuelling tanker scenario.....

Watch the orders from IAG, Lufthansa and others disappear..... And while they are at it, give Apple, google and microsoft a black eye.....

Aren't you tired of losing yet?
canuck44
canuck44 2
There was no treaty with Iran. This "agreement" was not submitted to Congress and the Persians did not even sign it. It had no enforcement clauses or penalties for violations if they could be detected. It was basically a side deal of the Obama Administration, the Europeans and Iran with $150 Billion thrown in.

An otherwise good article is ruined by this type of inaccuracy.
yr2012
matt jensen 2
Never ratified
canuck44
canuck44 4
Never even presented as it would have died in Senate.

登入

還沒有帳戶嗎? 現在就註冊(免費),設置諸多客制化功能、航班提醒等等!