Back to Squawk list
  • 19

Why UPS Cancelled Its Cargo Airbus A380 Order

提交時間:
 
Once upon a time, Airbus had taken orders for a freighter variant of its A380 superjumbo. Some of these orders came from global shipping giant UPS but were eventually canceled in 2007. Let’s take a look at why UPS eventually lost interest in operating the A380 as a cargo jet. (simpleflying.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


bkoskie
Billy Koskie 5
I gather the conversion cost would be prohibitive even now despite how relatively cheap A380s are going to become on the used aircraft market.
sparkie624
sparkie624 2
They would have to do major overall to the passenger Floorboard to even think about loading anykind of containers, and the structure to support the fuselage would be very heavy, costly, and time consuming.... To do that the wings would have to come off and the fuselage placed in a Fuselage Rack to support it and then it would still be incredibly tricky! and Costly!
shenghaohan
Shenghao Han 5
Contrary to Airbus's problem, Boeing can't get enough 747-8 passenger version orders.
In the end cargo usually run out of mass carrying capacity before run out of volume. And A380 really needed considerable redesign to support for a freighter version, while 747 was designed with freighter conversation in mind (back them Boeing was developing 2707)
stratofan
stratofan 2
The worst kept secret in the industry, is that the break even point for the A380 is far higher than that for a 747. Airbus gambled, and lost that passengers would want to be shoehorned into a 555 seat cabin. Sir Richard Branson had a novel idea with his wanting to put a hot tub or gym on the lower deck. I agree with many, that the 747 was the sweet spot in size, and dual purpose in design. Just like ocean liners, you can build too big.

登入

還沒有帳戶嗎? 現在就註冊(免費),設置諸多客制化功能、航班提醒等等!
本網站使用cookie。您使用並繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您接受這一點。
退出
您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎?
通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告,您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性,同時不顯突兀,以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單,或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.
退出