Could we get some consistency in reporting correct figures accurately? Your tag line £98m - link to BBC £92m - widely reported in press and media £150m (even if should have been quoted in $$ this would be £111m)
And also these planes are not just an American plane. A lot of it is made over here, and in Europe. It was originally labelled the joint strike fighter for a nato role.
Was this a planned return or did a flight of 5 have an 80% success rate for the mission?