← Back to Squawk list

45

Boeing 747 Freighter Tips Over Backwards After Being Improperly Unloaded in Qatar

提交時間：大約一年之前

Consider it a lesson in why you should always, always read the manual: A Boeing 747 freighter aircraft got tail-happy in an unexpected way at Qatar's Doha International Airport, when a weight imbalance reportedly brought about by improper unloading procedures caused it to tip backwards onto its tail and thrust the nose of the jumbo jet into the air. (www.thedrive.com) 更多...

63 個會員評論

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Shenghao Han 大約一年之前 22

V0... Rotate...

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Joey Cao 大約一年之前 3

Cleared for Launch

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

patrick baker 大約一年之前 9

boeing builds better butts: bet it was hardly scratched...

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sparkie624 大約一年之前 3

Normally those kinds of tips are gradual and very low impact.... Will take some careful planning, but damage should be minimal.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Atanu Dey 大約一年之前 1

I like your alliteration. You got five b's in a row.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

ffrcobra1 大約一年之前 9

I bet the guy in charge of installing the tail stand is looking for a new job.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Jim DeTour 大約一年之前 1

Yah there's also why weren't they unlocking and moving freight forward to adjust. Could of been snagged pallet and front kept offloading the front leaving the guys towards the rear in a predicament. Or some heavier machinery was loaded in the rear that loading they made sure a few pallets to offset loading the rear wouldn't tilt the plane. Should of been a warning from origin in that case. Looks like the tail stand might be standard for awhile :) Normally you get a good indication the plane is shifting exterior and interior. Evidently the guys inside were deaf and dumb because both wheeled loader operators should of been screaming.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Ron Nantes 大約一年之前 4

Should "have" not should "of".

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

B Johnson 大約一年之前 2

how about 'could have' ..

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

mark jones 大約一年之前 5

You experts here have it all wrong. This is the new, “Top Secret “ 747 in Dump configuration mode. It’s used for passengers who need to rapidly de-plane to catch a connection. For cargo, you dump it right into waiting trucks.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

srobak 大約一年之前 1

This is precisely why I always thought the C5 would make an excellent passenger plane.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

sparkie624 大約一年之前 4

Someone just got a 3 Day Vacation without pay... LOL...

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Allan Kidd 大約一年之前 4

if you look closely you will see that is the new JATO 747 in launch configuration

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

john krull 大約一年之前 1

Might save fuel, but a real loss of personnel. Hopefully

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Chris B 大約一年之前 4

Not at V2 yet.....

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sparkie624 大約一年之前 2

Put enough power between anything and it will go up.... We proved that with the Apollo Missions.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

James Simms 大約一年之前 3

And F4 Phantoms

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

dj horton 大約一年之前 3

Thankfully it was a lesson learned while it was still on the ground and not after it got airborne

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Jim Nasby 大約一年之前 1

Well, it is a lot harder to unload while in flight...

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

SmokedChops 大約一年之前 1

well, yes, there is that small issue... (these are right up there with the MX reports. "humming from behind center pedestal" reply "people behind pedestal told to learn actual lyrics")

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Richard Loven 大約一年之前 3

This is Boeing’s fault too. They didn't’ explain the loading procedures clearly enough.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sharon bias 大約一年之前 3

Well, it's not like the Iranians are going to get any parts to fix the thing from Boeing. Lucky for them it happened in Qatar. Qatar has a quality airport and they're equipped to handle this sort of stuff.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

MIKE SWICK 大約一年之前 3

checklists checklists checklists

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Darryl Lyons 大約一年之前 3

Weight and Balance 101. Progressive off-loading.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Scott Campbell 大約一年之前 3

They don't like that , almost as stupid as the dreaded 737-900 ... that needs a fuel burn to reach a preferred altitude and a tail stick to unload PX ... " Oh wait we can't divert there, they don't have a tail stick" the 37.10 will be a nightmare as well

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Thierry DAVROUX 大約一年之前 3

Check your keyboard !

Indeed, this remind me an accident that happen some years ago, to an Emirates A330 (or may be A340) departing from LFPG. Same problem, incorrect loading that cause a premature rotation at take-off (and this was a flight with passengers). There is a very instructive report from BEA (Bureau Enquete Accident) about it.

To summarize: the origin of this incident was an incorrect value entered in the load calculation software, at the very first stage of flight preparation. This was because of a $10 keyboard has a defective "5" key… and no control of a valid value by the software.

Incredible, but true !

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Thierry DAVROUX 大約一年之前 3

Correction : this was on a A300-600 in 1997.

If you wonder how a such error is possible, the report is still available here:
https://www.bea.aero/fileadmin/documents/docspa/1997/a6-o970730a/pdf/a6-o970730a.pdf

Read page 13 about the keyboard problem.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Matha Goram 大約一年之前 1

Million dollar aircraft and still using membrane keyboards? I had to use a $9 (MSRP) keyboard at work (the Gray Lady of Silicon Valley) and came home to a electro-mechanical keyboard at home. My keyboard is still working. Wonder what happened to the Gray Lady!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Mike Williams 大約一年之前 1

Back in the late '80s my alarm company used to install an inexpensive alarm system who used membrane keypads. We replaced at least 1 keypad/control for a coustomer who used a pencil's eraser. He was unable to use his fingers like most people do.As of now I belive that alarm system is now 100% unreacheable.It was an ACE security control panel from Adcor Electronics. I still have the installers programmming manual. I think we added a hard buttoned keypad to do normal daily on/off security functions.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Philip Hicks 大約一年之前 3

Didn't they have a tail steady [ tail jack ] ? Ar Auckland [ AKL ] when doing a turn around of a B747 Freighter the a/c handling crew always installed a tail steady. Signature required on our paperwork as well!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sparkie624 大約一年之前 3

You would think... But I guess you could say that got a real Tail Stand.... LOL.... Lay it on the tail and stand it up Proud.... :)

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

srobak 大約一年之前 1

shoulda fired up the engines and run it down the taxiway for a hell of a show.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

dardav 大約一年之前 4

as a infidel I accept all blame. Who knew. Somebody call somebody!!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

James Simms 大約一年之前 5

Rosie O’Donnell sitting in the back?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

[This poster has been suspended.]

Dave Fisher 大約一年之前 -2

asshole 2.0

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Dave Fisher 大約一年之前 -2

asshole comment

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Larry Loffelmacher 大約一年之前 2

Every few years we get one of these......photo op then forgotten.....it'll buff right out

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

TWA55 大約一年之前 2

What goes up will at some point go down, may nn to consider a tail stand.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Jim Welch 大約一年之前 2

You just KNOW some guy went home and had to say “Sorry Honey. I lost my job today.”

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

rastapoodle 大約一年之前 2

I was a 'loadmaster' for UPS Airlines for 8 years. I was expected to load/unload the 747 fast but always by the book. At airports where UPS had ground service vendors, if I witnessed something that could get me fired, I had to stop the vendor. Between a language barrier and being female, I did not always get cooperation, but I kept my job. Write-ups were time consuming but I was flying on that plane, so I was protecting my own a@@, as well. Loved our charters, got to see the world, loved the 747, DC-10, not so much. We rarely used the nose, mostly the side door.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Elliot Cannon 大約一年之前 1

I don't remember having loadmasters at UPS. I remember load supervisors but not "loadmasters". Of course that was 13 years ago.LOL I don't remember DC-10's either. Did you mean MD11?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

rastapoodle 大約一年之前 1

Sorry, I did mean MD-11. But yes, I did not work for the package side of the business, I worked for the Airline. We were part of the charters for the military for the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF).

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Richard Otterbourg 大約一年之前 2

Lets Keep the Comment's to the Topic

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Atanu Dey 大約一年之前 2

ROTFLMAO. Should have RTFM.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

john krull 大約一年之前 2

Fire up the engines with brakes on, then release brakes. Guaranteed shortest take off distance for ANY aircraft but VTOL. (Especially for a B747!).

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Ric Wernicke 大約一年之前 2

What do you expect when the loadmaster comes to work in short pants and flip-flops?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

SmokedChops 大約一年之前 1

"your LD3 of sildenafil is here!"..."how can you tell?"..."just a guess.."

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Scott Campbell 大約一年之前 1

just fly it home, no wing or engine damage

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Greg Starkey 大約一年之前 1

Don't they use 'load cell's ' ? DUH

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

panam1971 大約一年之前 1

I'm pretty sure somebody fell asleep during the class on "Weight and Balance"...

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sparkie624 大約一年之前 2

Must have been 1 of the 7 Dwarves... Maybe it was sleepy... Either way it goes, he/she got a rude awakening!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

CLARENCE HELLER 大約一年之前 1

Do the load plan in the office,then you know what will & what will not be correct. CAL lost a 747 due to improper repair of a tail strike. weakened the pressure bulkhead. broke in flight & lost all

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Michael Stansfield 大約一年之前 0

"Tips over backwards"? Did not look like it tipped over to me, just sitting on its tail. Modern journalist schools strike again.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

Viv Pike 大約一年之前 6

LOL. It tipped over backwards, dude. What else? OK - maybe English is not your first language.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

paul gilpin 大約一年之前 1

your wife boards an aircraft:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRuAhBMFu9g

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Neil49 大約一年之前 0

Infantile.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Jim Myers 大約一年之前 -3

Keep your filthy politics to yourself.

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Rich Boddy 大約一年之前 1

Why are you the way you are?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

cowboybob 大約一年之前 -1

wow Boeing probably screwed this up too....

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

joel wiley 大約一年之前 0

Don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist here, but how often does that kind of incident occur? This is the only one they have, and getting replacement parts can be dicey with the sanctions.
Was it accidental incompetence or deliberate?

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

sparkie624 大約一年之前 1

I don't think this was a conspiracy issue here, and I very seriously doubt that it was anything else other than someone screwed up in the work force... (IE Tail Stand)... But I would rather see one laid pm it's tail due to bad loading vs one where it's load shifted in flight.... For those who do not remember the "Crash of Boeing 747 in Afghanistan caused by shifting cargo" where "The National Transportation Safety Board said an improperly secured vehicle in cargo rendered the huge aircraft uncontrollable in 2013 crash" - At least here no one got injured (Severely anyway) - I imagine the guy moving the load inside the plane got a bruise or 2.... A little bit of sheet metal work and this one is back working again... (God Bless Sheet Metal Mechanics)!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•上層•Report

Dennis Stockton 大約一年之前 -7

Allahu Akbar!

回覆 ↓•永久連接•Report

登入

本網站使用cookie。您使用並繼續瀏覽本網站，即表示您接受這一點。

退出

您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎？

通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告，您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性，同時不顯突兀，以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單，或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.

退出