Back to Squawk list
  • 26

Sonic Cruiser Returns, Quietly

提交時間:
 
You thought the Sonic Cruiser was dead -- sacrificed more than nine years ago for the 787-yielding Super Efficient. (www.flightglobal.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


Falconus
Falconus 1
I wonder what at what speed that airplane is most efficient. As it said, at its normal speed, there would be a lot of extra drag due to approaching the sound barrier. Would it be more efficient at say, mach .85, and if so, what would the fuel burn be? I know that probably nobody here has an idea, I'm just curious to know whether if at normal (say, Mach .85) speed, it would be more or less efficient than a conventional similarly-sized aircraft. Then of course you could always fly it much faster if you needed to for some reason.
Derg
Roland Dent 1
Ba assured that this machine will be more efficient over M1. Ya casnnot design it any other way unless they are usin some kinda secret propulsion sysytem.
99NY
99NY 1
Looks alot like an up-sized Beriev Be-200 with a more blended and further aft wing.
captainjman
Jason Feldman 0
There is not a huge significant flight time from .85 to .98. Now if it was supersonic and economical - now that would be worth it.

登入

還沒有帳戶嗎? 現在就註冊(免費),設置諸多客制化功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟蹤是由廣告支持嗎?
通過允許展示來自FlightAware.com的廣告,您可以幫助我們使FlightAware保持免費。我們努力使我們的廣告保持相關性,同時不顯突兀,以創造一流的體驗。在FlightAware上將廣告加入白名單快速而簡單,或者請您考慮選擇我們的高級帳戶.
退出